From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Campbell v. State

Supreme Court of Indiana
Oct 20, 1960
241 Ind. 702 (Ind. 1960)

Summary

In Campbell, a County sheriff learned about a group of people who participated in a health club where several families gathered on weekends to play games in the nude.

Summary of this case from Zimmerman v. State

Opinion

No. 0-608.

Filed October 20, 1960. Rehearing denied November 16, 1960.

Ernest Campbell, petitioner, petitions for appeal from a denial of a writ of error coram nobis.

Petition dismissed.

Ernest Campbell, pro se.


Petitioner files what is designated "Application for Appeal of Writ of Error Coram Nobis, In Forma Pauperis." Petitioner states briefly that he did not receive a fair trial on a charge of kidnapping. That he thereafter was denied a writ of error coram nobis following the trial and that he desires to appeal therefrom and has no funds for such purpose.

There is no presumption that a trial court commits error in this state without a showing. The statutes of this state provide a public defender for the purpose of representing a petitioner such as this, where there is a meritorious ground for an appeal. There is no showing or even claim that the petitioner has applied to the public defender, as provided under the Acts of this state for representation and aid.

Burns' § 13-1401, et seq.

For the reasons stated, the petition is dismissed.

NOTE. — Reported in 169 N.E.2d 604.


Summaries of

Campbell v. State

Supreme Court of Indiana
Oct 20, 1960
241 Ind. 702 (Ind. 1960)

In Campbell, a County sheriff learned about a group of people who participated in a health club where several families gathered on weekends to play games in the nude.

Summary of this case from Zimmerman v. State

relying on TEX.PENAL CODE ANN. art. 526 (Vernon 1952)

Summary of this case from Hefner v. State
Case details for

Campbell v. State

Case Details

Full title:CAMPBELL v. STATE OF INDIANA

Court:Supreme Court of Indiana

Date published: Oct 20, 1960

Citations

241 Ind. 702 (Ind. 1960)
169 N.E.2d 604

Citing Cases

Zimmerman v. State

The Court of Criminal Appeals has held that "[i]t is the persons who can and do see the exhibition rather…

Willoughby v. State

The expense of such a record can be justified only on the ground that it be made available for the purpose of…