Summary
holding that difference of opinion between prisoner and his treating physicians about the offered alternatives and the preferred course of medical treatment does not constitute an Eighth Amendment violation
Summary of this case from Shoals v. CHP (Clinical Health Partners)Opinion
Civil Action No. 10-cv-02691-WJM-CBS
02-04-2015
DOUGLAS BURNS, Plaintiff, v. TED LAURANCE, TEJINDER SINGH, and MICHAEL ASSEN, Defendants.
Judge William J. Martínez
FINAL JUDGMENT
Pursuant to and in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a), all Orders entered during the pendency of this case and the Order Adopting January 12, 2015 Recommendation Of Magistrate Judge And Granting Defendants' Motion For Summary Judgment, entered by the Honorable William J. Martínez, United States District Judge, on February 3, 2015, it is
ORDERED that
1. The Magistrate Judge's Recommendation (ECF No. 219) is ADOPTED in its entirety;
2. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 213) is GRANTED; and
3. Final Judgment is entered in favor of Defendants and against the Plaintiff. Each party shall bear his own costs.
Dated at Denver, Colorado this 4th day of February 2015.
BY THE COURT:
JEFFREY P. COLWELL, CLERK
By: s/Deborah Hansen
Deborah Hansen, Deputy Clerk