From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

BURGI v. GURSTEL LAW FIRM, PA

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Oct 17, 2008
Civ. No. 07-4772 (PJS/RLE) (D. Minn. Oct. 17, 2008)

Summary

In Burgi, this Court adopted a magistrate judge's recommendation that a claim under the Minnesota Collection Agencies Act be dismissed because the statute had not been violated.

Summary of this case from Edeh v. Midland Credit Management, Inc.

Opinion

Civ. No. 07-4772 (PJS/RLE).

October 17, 2008


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION


Based upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Raymond L. Erickson, and after an independent review of the files, records and proceedings in the above-entitled matter, IT IS ORDERED:

1. That Gurstel's Motion to Dismiss [Docket No. 6] is granted.

2. That the Burgis' Federal causes of action is dismissed with prejudice.

3. That the Burgis' State law cause of action under the Minnesota Collection Agencies Act, Minnesota Statutes Section 332.37, is dismissed with prejudice, and any remaining State law actions be dismissed without prejudice.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.


Summaries of

BURGI v. GURSTEL LAW FIRM, PA

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Oct 17, 2008
Civ. No. 07-4772 (PJS/RLE) (D. Minn. Oct. 17, 2008)

In Burgi, this Court adopted a magistrate judge's recommendation that a claim under the Minnesota Collection Agencies Act be dismissed because the statute had not been violated.

Summary of this case from Edeh v. Midland Credit Management, Inc.
Case details for

BURGI v. GURSTEL LAW FIRM, PA

Case Details

Full title:Yvonne Burgi and Robert J. Burgi, Plaintiffs, v. Gurstel Law Firm, PA, OSI…

Court:United States District Court, D. Minnesota

Date published: Oct 17, 2008

Citations

Civ. No. 07-4772 (PJS/RLE) (D. Minn. Oct. 17, 2008)

Citing Cases

Hesford v. Jefferson Capital Sys.

District courts within the Eighth Circuit have likewise found that there is no private right of action for…

Edeh v. Midland Credit Management, Inc.

Judge Noel found, and the Court agrees, that no private right of action exists under the Minnesota Collection…