Summary
denying motion to stay pending exhaustion of claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel that was not presented in habeas corpus petition
Summary of this case from Pitts v. Warden, Lebanon Corr. Inst.Opinion
Case Number: 1:07cv392.
March 31, 2008
ORDER
This matter is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Western Division to United States Magistrate Judge Timothy S. Hogan. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings and filed with this Court on February 8, 2008 a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 6). Subsequently, the Petitioner filed objections to such Report and Recommendation (Doc. 10).
The Court has reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de novo all of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court does determine that such Recommendations should be adopted.
Accordingly, Petitioner's Motion for leave to stay the proceedings and hold in abeyance is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.