From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bull v. Logan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 1, 1919
189 App. Div. 892 (N.Y. App. Div. 1919)

Summary

In Logan v. Bull, 78 Ky. 607, this precise contention was made, and in denying it the court said: "The general doctrine is, that a contract incapable of being enforced against one party, that party is equally incapable of enforcing it against the other.

Summary of this case from Buckhorn Coal Lumber Co. v. Lewis

Opinion

October, 1919.

Present — Clarke, P.J., Dowling, Page, Merrell and Philbin, JJ.


Motion to dismiss appeal granted, with ten dollars costs, unless appellant comply with terms stated in order.


Summaries of

Bull v. Logan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 1, 1919
189 App. Div. 892 (N.Y. App. Div. 1919)

In Logan v. Bull, 78 Ky. 607, this precise contention was made, and in denying it the court said: "The general doctrine is, that a contract incapable of being enforced against one party, that party is equally incapable of enforcing it against the other.

Summary of this case from Buckhorn Coal Lumber Co. v. Lewis
Case details for

Bull v. Logan

Case Details

Full title:HARCOURT BULL v. JAMES J. LOGAN

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 1, 1919

Citations

189 App. Div. 892 (N.Y. App. Div. 1919)

Citing Cases

Ward Real Estate v. Childers

The appellants have moved this court to grant them an appeal. Although the title to the farm at the time…

Maynard v. Lowe

Under the issues in this case, we think the appellant had the right, at any time before judgment, to perfect…