From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. New York City

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 10, 2008
50 A.D.3d 377 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

Opinion

No. 3329.

April 10, 2008.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Faviola Soto, J.), entered October 13, 2006, after a jury trial, in defendant's favor, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Thomas Torto, New York, for appellant.

Wallace Gossett, Brooklyn (Lawrence Heisler of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Mazzarelli, J.P., Andrias, Gonzalez and Acosta, JJ.


Plaintiff's argument that the verdict was irreconcilably inconsistent is unpreserved, since this issue was not raised prior to discharge of the jury ( see Martinez v New York City Tr. Auth., 41 AD3d 174). Moreover, this matter does not present a situation where the questions of negligence and proximate cause are inextricably interwoven ( see Dwight v New York City Tr. Auth., 30 AD3d 270, lv denied 7 NY3d 711). The jury's determination that defendant's negligence was not a substantial factor in causing plaintiff's injury was not inconsistent or against the weight of the evidence ( see id.). Finally, the trial court properly rejected plaintiff's attempt to impeach the jury's verdict by the posttrial submission of affidavits from two of its members ( see Sharrow v Dick Corp., 86 NY2d 54, 60-61).


Summaries of

Brown v. New York City

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 10, 2008
50 A.D.3d 377 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
Case details for

Brown v. New York City

Case Details

Full title:CRYSTAL BROWN, Appellant, v. NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 10, 2008

Citations

50 A.D.3d 377 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 3111
858 N.Y.S.2d 4

Citing Cases

Duran v. Nanda

When a verdict can be reconciled with a reasonable view of the evidence, the successful party is entitled to…