From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. Johns

United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Northern Division
Mar 20, 2007
Case No. 2:05-cv-43 (W.D. Mich. Mar. 20, 2007)

Summary

denying the injunction because plaintiff did not attempt to show a likelihood of success in his motion and because the motion requested relief "unrelated to lawsuit against individuals who are not parties to action"

Summary of this case from Neal v. Banks

Opinion

Case No. 2:05-cv-43.

March 20, 2007


OPINION AND ORDER APPROVING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION


The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation filed by the United States Magistrate Judge in this action. The Report and Recommendation was duly served on the parties, and no objection has been made thereto within the time required by law.

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Docket #43) is approved and adopted as the opinion of the Court.

2. Plaintiff's motion for an order of protection (Docket #40) is DENIED.


Summaries of

Brown v. Johns

United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Northern Division
Mar 20, 2007
Case No. 2:05-cv-43 (W.D. Mich. Mar. 20, 2007)

denying the injunction because plaintiff did not attempt to show a likelihood of success in his motion and because the motion requested relief "unrelated to lawsuit against individuals who are not parties to action"

Summary of this case from Neal v. Banks
Case details for

Brown v. Johns

Case Details

Full title:JOHNNY BROWN, Plaintiff, v. UNKNOWN JOHNS, et al. Defendants

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Northern Division

Date published: Mar 20, 2007

Citations

Case No. 2:05-cv-43 (W.D. Mich. Mar. 20, 2007)

Citing Cases

Snelling v. Romanowski

This court has held that an injunction "should not issue when it deals with a matter lying wholly outside the…

Neal v. Banks

The lack of evidence combined with Neal requesting his injunction because of unrelated actions of unnamed…