From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. Inch

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TLLAHASSEE DIVISION
Jan 16, 2020
Case No. 4:17cv509-MW/MJF (N.D. Fla. Jan. 16, 2020)

Summary

dismissing similar action

Summary of this case from Wilson v. Inch

Opinion

Case No. 4:17cv509-MW/MJF

01-16-2020

MICHAEL BROWN, Petitioner, v. MARK S. INCH, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This Court has considered, without hearing, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. ECF No. 42. Upon consideration, no objections having been filed by the parties,

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation is accepted and adopted as this Court's opinion. The Clerk shall enter judgment stating, "The petition for writ of habeas corpus, ECF No. 1, challenging the judgment of conviction and sentence in State of Florida v. Michael R. Brown, Leon County Circuit Court Case No. 2011-CF-2407, is DENIED. A Certificate of Appealability is DENIED." The Clerk shall also close the file.

SO ORDERED on January 16, 2020.

s/ MARK E. WALKER

Chief United States District Judge


Summaries of

Brown v. Inch

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TLLAHASSEE DIVISION
Jan 16, 2020
Case No. 4:17cv509-MW/MJF (N.D. Fla. Jan. 16, 2020)

dismissing similar action

Summary of this case from Wilson v. Inch
Case details for

Brown v. Inch

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL BROWN, Petitioner, v. MARK S. INCH, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TLLAHASSEE DIVISION

Date published: Jan 16, 2020

Citations

Case No. 4:17cv509-MW/MJF (N.D. Fla. Jan. 16, 2020)

Citing Cases

Wilson v. Inch

In short, even if the Petitioner had brought his claim under § 2241, he would "not state a basis for habeas…