From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. Dutchess Cnty. Mut. Ins. Co., Poughkeepsie

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jan 1, 1904
90 App. Div. 613 (N.Y. App. Div. 1904)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

In Morris v. Dutchess Insurance Company, 67 W. Va. 368, 68 S.E. 22, it was held that the furnishing of preliminary proofs of loss as required by an insurance policy "is a condition precedent to any right of action thereon, and unless waived an action on the policy does not accrue to the insured until such proofs have been furnished."

Summary of this case from Ragland v. Nationwide Ins. Co.
See 1 Summary

Opinion

January, 1904.

Judgment affirmed, with costs, upon opinion of Rumsey, J., in same case, reported, 64 Appellate Division, 9. All concurred.

Summaries of

Brown v. Dutchess Cnty. Mut. Ins. Co., Poughkeepsie

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jan 1, 1904
90 App. Div. 613 (N.Y. App. Div. 1904)

In Morris v. Dutchess Insurance Company, 67 W. Va. 368, 68 S.E. 22, it was held that the furnishing of preliminary proofs of loss as required by an insurance policy "is a condition precedent to any right of action thereon, and unless waived an action on the policy does not accrue to the insured until such proofs have been furnished."

Summary of this case from Ragland v. Nationwide Ins. Co.
Case details for

Brown v. Dutchess Cnty. Mut. Ins. Co., Poughkeepsie

Case Details

Full title:Morris Brown. Appellant, v. Dutchess County Mutual Insurance Company of…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jan 1, 1904

Citations

90 App. Div. 613 (N.Y. App. Div. 1904)

Citing Cases

Maynard v. Ins. Co.

"Furnishing of the preliminary proofs of loss as required by the conditions of a policy of fire insurance is…

Rucker v. Fire Assoc

We are assuming, therefore, that unless waived, such provision should be upheld. However, a definite denial…

6 Citing Cases