From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brisbane v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Aug 20, 2013
119 So. 3d 1263 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

affirming per curiam Brisbane's convictions on direct appeal in Case No. 5D12–3009

Summary of this case from Brisbane v. State
See 1 Summary

Opinion

No. 5D12–3009.

2013-08-20

Marquies BRISBANE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Julie H. O'Kane, Judge. Edwin R. Ivy, Orlando, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Rebecca Roark Wall, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Julie H. O'Kane, Judge.
Edwin R. Ivy, Orlando, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Rebecca Roark Wall, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

SAWAYA, COHEN and BERGER, JJ., concur.

Summaries of

Brisbane v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Aug 20, 2013
119 So. 3d 1263 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

affirming per curiam Brisbane's convictions on direct appeal in Case No. 5D12–3009

Summary of this case from Brisbane v. State
Case details for

Brisbane v. State

Case Details

Full title:Marquies BRISBANE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Date published: Aug 20, 2013

Citations

119 So. 3d 1263 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

Citing Cases

Brisbane v. State

ing argument not raised in initial brief barred); Parker–Cyrus v. Just. Admin. Comm'n, 160 So.3d 926, 928…

1 Citing Cases