From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Branick v. Downey Savings & Loan

Supreme Court of California
Apr 27, 2005
28 Cal. Rptr. 3d 2 (Cal. 2005)

Summary

granting petition for review

Summary of this case from Standfacts Credit Services, Inc. v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.

Opinion


Page __

__ Cal.4th __ 28 Cal.Rptr.3d 2, 110 P.3d 1217 BRANICK v. DOWNEY SAVINGS & LOAN. No. S132433. Supreme Court of California April 27, 2005

         Prior report: Cal.App., 24 Cal.Rptr.3d 406.

         Petition for review granted; issues limited

         Petition for review GRANTED.

         The issue to be briefed and argued is limited to the following: If the standing limitations of Proposition 64 apply to actions under the Unfair Competition Law that were pending on November 3, 2004, may a plaintiff amend his or her complaint to substitute in or add a party that satisfies standing requirements of Business and Professions Code section 17204, as amended, and does such an amended complaint relate back to the initial complaint for statute of limitations purposes?

         GEORGE, C.J., KENNARD, BAXTER, WERDEGAR, CHIN, BROWN, and MORENO, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Branick v. Downey Savings & Loan

Supreme Court of California
Apr 27, 2005
28 Cal. Rptr. 3d 2 (Cal. 2005)

granting petition for review

Summary of this case from Standfacts Credit Services, Inc. v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.
Case details for

Branick v. Downey Savings & Loan

Case Details

Full title:BRANICK v. DOWNEY SAVINGS & LOAN.

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Apr 27, 2005

Citations

28 Cal. Rptr. 3d 2 (Cal. 2005)
110 P.3d 1217

Citing Cases

Abels v. JBC Legal Group, P.C.

On April 27, 2005 the California Supreme Court granted review in five of the cases in which the Proposition…

Standfacts Credit Services, Inc. v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.

Currently under consideration by the California Supreme Court is the issue of whether Proposition 64's…