From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Boyd v. South Carolina

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA AIKEN DIVISION
Feb 10, 2012
C/A No.: 1:11-2981-TMC-SVH (D.S.C. Feb. 10, 2012)

Summary

noting the first prong of the abstention test was satisfied where the petitioner alleged that "he is currently awaiting trial in an ongoing state criminal proceeding"

Summary of this case from Nowlin v. Johnson

Opinion

C/A No.: 1:11-2981-TMC-SVH

02-10-2012

Billy Roy Boyd, Petitioner, v. State of South Carolina, Respondent.


ORDER

This is an action seeking habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Under Local Civil Rule 73.02(B)(2) (D.S.C.), pretrial proceedings in this action have been referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge.

By order dated December 27, 2011, Petitioner was given a specific time frame in which to bring this case into proper form. Petitioner has complied with the court's order, and this case is now in proper form. Petitioner has paid the full filing fee. TO THE CLERK OF COURT:

The Clerk of Court shall not serve the § 2241 Petition upon Respondent because the Petition is subject to dismissal.

IT IS SO RECOMMENDED. February 10, 2012
Columbia, South Carolina

_____________

Shiva V. Hodges

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Boyd v. South Carolina

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA AIKEN DIVISION
Feb 10, 2012
C/A No.: 1:11-2981-TMC-SVH (D.S.C. Feb. 10, 2012)

noting the first prong of the abstention test was satisfied where the petitioner alleged that "he is currently awaiting trial in an ongoing state criminal proceeding"

Summary of this case from Nowlin v. Johnson
Case details for

Boyd v. South Carolina

Case Details

Full title:Billy Roy Boyd, Petitioner, v. State of South Carolina, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA AIKEN DIVISION

Date published: Feb 10, 2012

Citations

C/A No.: 1:11-2981-TMC-SVH (D.S.C. Feb. 10, 2012)

Citing Cases

Carter v. Florence Cnty. Det. Ctr.

; thus, the first element is satisfied. See Boyd v. South Carolina, No. 1:11-cv-2981-TMC-SVH, 2012 WL…

Young v. Dir. of Florence Cnty. Det. Ctr.

See Boyd v. South Carolina, No. 1:11-cv-02981-TMC-SVH, 2012 WL 786341, at *2 (D.S.C. Feb. 10, …