From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Boyd v. Parke

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Jun 24, 1997
96-1247 (7th Cir. Jun. 24, 1997)

Summary

In Boyd v. Parke, 1997 WL 374846, at *3 (7th Cir. June 24, 1997), the Seventh Circuit held that a petitioner was no longer in custody because his disciplinary sanction had expired; however, Boyd is distinguishable because it only involved a challenge to disciplinary segregation, a sanction that had no effect on the duration of the petitioner's custody.

Summary of this case from Pittman v. Casanova

Opinion

96-1247.

June 24, 1997.

Appeal from N.D.Ind.


Decisions Without Published Opinions Affirmed


Summaries of

Boyd v. Parke

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Jun 24, 1997
96-1247 (7th Cir. Jun. 24, 1997)

In Boyd v. Parke, 1997 WL 374846, at *3 (7th Cir. June 24, 1997), the Seventh Circuit held that a petitioner was no longer in custody because his disciplinary sanction had expired; however, Boyd is distinguishable because it only involved a challenge to disciplinary segregation, a sanction that had no effect on the duration of the petitioner's custody.

Summary of this case from Pittman v. Casanova
Case details for

Boyd v. Parke

Case Details

Full title:Boyd v. Parke

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit

Date published: Jun 24, 1997

Citations

96-1247 (7th Cir. Jun. 24, 1997)

Citing Cases

Pittman v. Casanova

See Pet. Reply Brief. In Boyd v. Parke, 1997 WL 374846, at *3 (7th Cir. June 24, 1997), the Seventh Circuit…