From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bowman v. Mann

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Apr 3, 2017
No. 16-7485 (4th Cir. Apr. 3, 2017)

Summary

recognizing a dismissal without prejudice is proper where Heck applies

Summary of this case from Jones v. Cayce Pub. Safety

Opinion

No. 16-7485

04-03-2017

JIMMY BOWMAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. J. T. MANN, individually and in official capacity, Detective, Prince George Police Department; DET. BRYANT, individually and in official capacity, Detective, Prince George Police Department, Defendants - Appellees.

Jimmy Bowman, Appellant Pro Se. Jim H. Guynn, Jr., GUYNN & WADDELL P.C., Salem, Virginia, for Appellees.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:15-cv-00521-REP-RCY) Before TRAXLER and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed as modified by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jimmy Bowman, Appellant Pro Se. Jim H. Guynn, Jr., GUYNN & WADDELL P.C., Salem, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Jimmy Bowman appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. Bowen's claims are not cognizable under § 1983 because a judgment in his favor would necessarily imply that his subsequent criminal conviction was invalid and Bowen has not shown that his conviction has been reversed, expunged, declared invalid, or otherwise called into question. Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 486-87 (2006). Because Bowman may refile his claims should his conviction ever be overturned or called into question by the appropriate court, we modify the dismissal to be without prejudice and affirm as modified. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

In the district court, Bowman included a state constitutional claim. The district court declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over this claim and dismissed it without prejudice. Bowen does not challenge this ruling in his informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b) ("The Court will limit its review to the issues raised in the informal brief."). --------

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED


Summaries of

Bowman v. Mann

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Apr 3, 2017
No. 16-7485 (4th Cir. Apr. 3, 2017)

recognizing a dismissal without prejudice is proper where Heck applies

Summary of this case from Jones v. Cayce Pub. Safety

recognizing a dismissal without prejudice is proper where Heck applies

Summary of this case from Gause v. City of Conway Police Dep't

indicating a dismissal based on Heck should be without prejudice

Summary of this case from Pickens v. S.C. Dept. of Prob., Parole, & Pardon Servs.

indicating a dismissal based on Heck should be without prejudice

Summary of this case from Bolick v. Stirling

modifying the district court's dismissal based on Heck to be without prejudice

Summary of this case from High v. Chandler
Case details for

Bowman v. Mann

Case Details

Full title:JIMMY BOWMAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. J. T. MANN, individually and in…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Apr 3, 2017

Citations

No. 16-7485 (4th Cir. Apr. 3, 2017)

Citing Cases

Pickens v. S.C. Dept. of Prob., Parole, & Pardon Servs.

Dismissal is without prejudice given Heck's application. See, e.g., Bowman v. Mann, 683 Fed.Appx. 258, 259…

Jones v. Cayce Pub. Safety

The Court is dismissing Plaintiffs complaint without prejudice in light of Heck's application. See Bowman v.…