Summary
finding no clearly established federal law indicating the trial court was required to make Waller findings in light of the petitioner's failure to object to closure of the courtroom
Summary of this case from Bowers v. MichiganOpinion
CASE NO. 1:13 CV 00857
09-30-2014
RAYMOND BOLAN, Petitioner, v. CHRISTOPHER LaROSE, Warden, Respondent.
ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE LESLEY WELLS
This matter comes before the Court on United States Magistrate Judge Greg White's Report and Recommendation advising that petitioner Raymond Bolan's petition for the writ of habeas corpus be denied. No timely objections have been filed. The Court, accordingly, adopts the Report and Recommendation as its own and denies Mr. Bolan's petition.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), this Court makes a de novo determination of those portions of the R&R to which a timely objection is made. "When no timely objection is filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation." Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) advisory committee's note.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ Lesley Wells
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Date: 30 September 2014