From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bloss v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Nov 27, 1963
372 S.W.2d 696 (Tex. Crim. App. 1963)

Summary

In Bloss, the court of criminal appeals held, "[i]n the absence of a recognizance entered into in open court or an appeal bond approved after the term of open court had expired, or a showing that the appellant is in custody, this Court is without jurisdiction to enter any order other than to dismiss the appeal."

Summary of this case from Cuellar v. State

Opinion

No. 36036.

November 27, 1963.

Appeal from County Court at Law, Taylor County, Theo Ash, J.

T. M. Reid, Abilene, for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.


Our former opinion and order affirming the conviction is withdrawn.

The offense is drunk driving; the punishment, 3 days in jail and a fine of $100.

Appellant's motion for new trial was overruled and notice of appeal was given on March 6, 1963. On the same day the appellant's bond on appeal was approved.

Art. 830 Vernon's Ann.C.C.P. provides for a bail bond on appeal only after the expiration of the term. It provides that when the defendant appeals in any misdemeanor case he shall, if he be in custody, be committed to jail unless he enter into recognizance as provided by law. Art 831 V.A.C.C.P. sets out the form of such a recognizance which must be entered into in open court.

In the absence of a recognizance entered into in open court or an appeal bond approved after the term of court had expired, or a showing that the appellant is in custody, this Court is without jurisdiction to enter any order other than to dismiss the appeal. Thompson v. State, 166 Tex.Crim. R., 317 S.W.2d 61; Nance v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 318 S.W.2d 666; Ross v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 318 S.W.2d 641; and other cases cited under Art. 830 V.A.C.C.P., Note 4.

Appellant's motion for rehearing is granted and the appeal is dismissed.


Summaries of

Bloss v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Nov 27, 1963
372 S.W.2d 696 (Tex. Crim. App. 1963)

In Bloss, the court of criminal appeals held, "[i]n the absence of a recognizance entered into in open court or an appeal bond approved after the term of open court had expired, or a showing that the appellant is in custody, this Court is without jurisdiction to enter any order other than to dismiss the appeal."

Summary of this case from Cuellar v. State
Case details for

Bloss v. State

Case Details

Full title:Buddy Stewart BLOSS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Nov 27, 1963

Citations

372 S.W.2d 696 (Tex. Crim. App. 1963)

Citing Cases

Cuellar v. State

In its brief, the State raises a plea to jurisdiction, asserting that because appellant is not in custody and…

Najar v. State

The record reflects that the appellant is at large on an appeal bond approved and filed during the term of…