In Bliss v. Sickles (50 N.Y. St. Repr. 139) there were intervals of five and eight months between the false representations and the transactions founded on them; and in The Naugatuck Cutlery Co. v. Babcock (22 Hun; 481) there was an interval of five months.

In Bliss v. Sickles et al. (supra) the defendants made statements to a mercantile agency in December, 1888, and in May and August, 1889, which the plaintiff relied on in making sales between January 11 and April 26, 1890, and it was held that these statements were continuing ones on which the plaintiff had the right to rely, and if fraudulent, that the sales could be rescinded and the goods recovered.