From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Blackman v. Stephens

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Feb 18, 2015
No. 3:13-cv-2073-P-BN (N.D. Tex. Feb. 18, 2015)

Summary

transferring to the Fifth Circuit as successive habeas application presenting claims first raised and then exhausted in the state courts only after prior federal-court consideration of the same state conviction

Summary of this case from Blanton v. Stephens

Opinion

No. 3:13-cv-2073-P-BN

02-18-2015

TELISA DE'ANN BLACKMAN, Petitioner v. WILLIAM STEPHENS, Director Texas Department of Criminal Justice Correctional Institutions Division, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS , CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a recommendation in these consolidated cases. An objection was filed by Petitioner. The District Court reviewed de novo those portions of the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation to which objection was made, and reviewed the remaining proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation for plain error. Finding no error, the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.

SO ORDERED this 18th day of February, 2015.

/s/_________

JORGE A. SOLIS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Blackman v. Stephens

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Feb 18, 2015
No. 3:13-cv-2073-P-BN (N.D. Tex. Feb. 18, 2015)

transferring to the Fifth Circuit as successive habeas application presenting claims first raised and then exhausted in the state courts only after prior federal-court consideration of the same state conviction

Summary of this case from Blanton v. Stephens
Case details for

Blackman v. Stephens

Case Details

Full title:TELISA DE'ANN BLACKMAN, Petitioner v. WILLIAM STEPHENS, Director Texas…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: Feb 18, 2015

Citations

No. 3:13-cv-2073-P-BN (N.D. Tex. Feb. 18, 2015)

Citing Cases

Wyatt v. Texas

AEDPA forbids such a reading: Section 2244(b)(2)(B)(i) states that claims based on a factual predicate not…

Wilkerson v. Davis

(quoting In re Morris, 328 F.3d 739, 740 (5th Cir. 2003))). Wilkerson's assertions concerning…