From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bismarck v. Stuart

Supreme Court of North Dakota
Apr 23, 1996
546 N.W.2d 366 (N.D. 1996)

Summary

implying existence of right

Summary of this case from Johnson v. City of Cincinnati

Opinion

Criminal No. 950383.

April 23, 1996.

Appeal from the District Court for Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District; the Honorable Benny A. Graff, Judge.

Paul H. Fraase (argued), City Prosecutor, Bismarck, for plaintiff and appellee.

Ronald E. Stuart (argued), Valley City, pro se for defendant and appellant.


Ronald Stuart appeals from his conviction for driving while under suspension. Stuart argues that he has a constitutional right to operate an automobile on public roads without a driver's license. No court has ever held that it is an impermissible infringement upon a citizen's constitutional Right to Travel for the Legislature to decree that, unless exempted by statute, every person who operates a motor vehicle on public roads must have a valid operator's license, as NDCC 39-06-01 and following sections mandate. See State v. Skurdal, 235 Mont. 291, 767 P.2d 304 (1988); City of Salina v. Wisden, 737 P.2d 981, 983 (Utah 1987); Boutin v. Conway, 153 Vt. 558, 572 A.2d 905, 909 (1990). The Legislature has the constitutional police power to ensure safe drivers and safe roads. State v. Kouba, 319 N.W.2d 161, 163 (N.D. 1982). We affirm under NDRAppP 35.1(a)(7). State v. Stuart, 544 N.W.2d 158 (N.D. 1996).

We order that this decision be published in the regular manner. See NDRAppP 35.1(b).

VANDE WALLE, C.J., and MESCHKE, SANDSTROM, NEUMANN and MARING, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Bismarck v. Stuart

Supreme Court of North Dakota
Apr 23, 1996
546 N.W.2d 366 (N.D. 1996)

implying existence of right

Summary of this case from Johnson v. City of Cincinnati
Case details for

Bismarck v. Stuart

Case Details

Full title:CITY OF BISMARCK, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Ronald E. STUART, Defendant…

Court:Supreme Court of North Dakota

Date published: Apr 23, 1996

Citations

546 N.W.2d 366 (N.D. 1996)

Citing Cases

Trujillo v. State

So, too, in Quackenbush v. Superior Court, 60 Cal. App. 4th 454, 70 Cal. Rptr. 2d 271 (1997), the California…

STATE v. SOUM

We have repeatedly rejected that argument. See City of Bismarck v. Stuart, 546 N.W.2d 366, 367 (N.D. 1996);…