Summary
explaining that Maryland courts routinely apply Title VII standards to Maryland Title 20 discrimination cases
Summary of this case from Greene v. Harris Corp.Opinion
No. 11-1854
02-16-2012
Joyce E. Smithey, RIFKIN, LIVINGSTON, LEVITAN & SILVER, LLC, Annapolis, Maryland, for Appellant. Edmund J. O'Meally, Andrew G. Scott, Lisa Y. Settles, HODES, PESSIN, & KATZ, PA, Towson, Maryland, for Appellee.
UNPUBLISHED
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Chief District Judge. (8:11-cv-01100-DKC)
Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joyce E. Smithey, RIFKIN, LIVINGSTON, LEVITAN & SILVER, LLC, Annapolis, Maryland, for Appellant. Edmund J. O'Meally, Andrew G. Scott, Lisa Y. Settles, HODES, PESSIN, & KATZ, PA, Towson, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Dwight Bishop, Jr., appeals the district court's dismissal of his complaint under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bishop v. Bd. of Educ. for Calvert Cnty. Pub. Schs., No. 8:11-cv-01100-DKC (D. Md. July 5, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED