recognizing that the Double Jeopardy Clause "is not implicated when conduct that led to a conviction and sentence on new criminal charges also formed the basis for a VOP finding of guilt and VOP sentence"
Summary of this case from Twyman v. McBrideNo. 239, 2016
04-12-2017
Jamil BIDDLE, Defendant Below, Appellant, v. STATE of Delaware, Plaintiff Below, Appellee.
AFFIRMED.
recognizing that the Double Jeopardy Clause "is not implicated when conduct that led to a conviction and sentence on new criminal charges also formed the basis for a VOP finding of guilt and VOP sentence"
Summary of this case from Twyman v. McBrideFull title:Jamil BIDDLE, Defendant Below, Appellant, v. STATE of Delaware, Plaintiff…
Court:Supreme Court of Delaware.
Date published: Apr 12, 2017
U.S. Const. amend V; Del. Const. art. I, § 8; Evans v. State, 445 A.2d 932, 933 (Del. 1982). See, e.g.,…
Sewell v. State11 Del. C. § 4334(c).Biddle v. State , 2017 WL 1376412, at *2 (Del. Apr. 12, 2017) (citing Wallace v. State ,…