From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Berens v. Berens

United States District Court, D. Columbia
Dec 13, 1939
30 F. Supp. 869 (D.D.C. 1939)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

observing that one of the policy reasons to render a declaratory judgment is to "terminate and afford relief from the uncertainty, insecurity, and controversy giving rise to the proceedings"

Summary of this case from Ill. Farmers Ins. Co. v. Phelps
See 2 Summaries

Opinion

Civ. A. No. 3366.

December 13, 1939.

Albert Lyman, of Washington, D.C., for plaintiff.

Gerald I. Oxenburg, of Washington, D.C., for defendant.

PROCTOR, Associate Justice.

The motion of defendant to dismiss plaintiff's motion for temporary injunction will be stricken. It is an unnecessary pleading, which ought not be encouraged.

The motion of plaintiff to enjoin defendant is denied.

Summaries of

Berens v. Berens

United States District Court, D. Columbia
Dec 13, 1939
30 F. Supp. 869 (D.D.C. 1939)

observing that one of the policy reasons to render a declaratory judgment is to "terminate and afford relief from the uncertainty, insecurity, and controversy giving rise to the proceedings"

Summary of this case from Ill. Farmers Ins. Co. v. Phelps

In Berens v. Berens, D.C.D.C., 30 F. Supp. 869, the court held that a motion to dismiss a motion is unnecessary pleading which ought not to be encouraged.

Summary of this case from McVay v. District Court
Case details for

Berens v. Berens

Case Details

Full title:BERENS v. BERENS

Court:United States District Court, D. Columbia

Date published: Dec 13, 1939

Citations

30 F. Supp. 869 (D.D.C. 1939)

Citing Cases

Wilder v. Reno

The declaratory judgment was dismissed for lack of adversary parties, there being no real defendant to answer…

Wilder v. Doe

PER CURIAM. The judgment of the District Court is affirmed upon the opinion of Judge Kirkpatrick, 30 F. Supp.…

6 Citing Cases