From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Benitez v. McGrew

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION
Aug 29, 2013
No. CV 13-1202-MWF (PLA) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 29, 2013)

Summary

concluding § 2241 petition was moot where petitioner had paid in full his felony assessment and thus was no longer a participant in the IFRP

Summary of this case from Scott v. Wilson

Opinion

No. CV 13-1202-MWF (PLA)

08-29-2013

RICHARD BENITEZ, Petitioner, v. WARDEN McGREW, Respondent.


ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE

JUDGE'S REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the entire file de novo, including the magistrate judge's report and recommendation. The Court agrees with the recommendations of the magistrate judge.

ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED:

1. The report and recommendation is adopted.

2. Respondent's Motion to Dismiss is granted, without leave to amend.

3. Judgment shall be entered consistent with this order.

4. The clerk shall serve this order and the judgment on all counsel or parties of record.

_________________________________

HONORABLE MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Benitez v. McGrew

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION
Aug 29, 2013
No. CV 13-1202-MWF (PLA) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 29, 2013)

concluding § 2241 petition was moot where petitioner had paid in full his felony assessment and thus was no longer a participant in the IFRP

Summary of this case from Scott v. Wilson
Case details for

Benitez v. McGrew

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD BENITEZ, Petitioner, v. WARDEN McGREW, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Aug 29, 2013

Citations

No. CV 13-1202-MWF (PLA) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 29, 2013)

Citing Cases

Scott v. Wilson

(Williams Decl. ¶ 11.) Therefore, Scott's challenge to the application of the IFRP to payment of his special…