From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Beddingfield v. Allegheny County

U.S.
Mar 18, 1996
516 U.S. 1173 (1996)

Summary

recognizing that the relation back provision of Rule 15(c) "ameliorates" the effect of a statute of limitations but denying motion to amend pleadings

Summary of this case from Williams v. Vaughn

Opinion

No. 95-1141.

March 18, 1996.


ORDER

C.A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 60 F. 3d 1010.


Summaries of

Beddingfield v. Allegheny County

U.S.
Mar 18, 1996
516 U.S. 1173 (1996)

recognizing that the relation back provision of Rule 15(c) "ameliorates" the effect of a statute of limitations but denying motion to amend pleadings

Summary of this case from Williams v. Vaughn
Case details for

Beddingfield v. Allegheny County

Case Details

Full title:BEDDINGFIELD ET AL. v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY ET AL

Court:U.S.

Date published: Mar 18, 1996

Citations

516 U.S. 1173 (1996)

Citing Cases

Armstrong v. Martin Marietta Corp.

See Nelson v. County of Allegheny, 860 F. Supp. 1080, 1084 (W.D.Pa. 1994) ("In our view, . . . once…

State v. McLendon

O'Day v. King County, 109 Wn.2d 796, 817, 749 P.2d 142 (1988); State v. Scheffel, 82 Wn.2d 872, 879, 514 P.2d…