From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bd. of Overseers of the Bar v. Carey

STATE OF MAINE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT
Mar 7, 2016
Docket No BAR-16-8 (Me. Mar. 7, 2016)

Opinion

Docket No BAR-16-8

03-07-2016

BOARD OF OVERSEERS OF THE BAR, Petitioner v. SETH T. CAREY, ESQ., Maine Bar #9970 Respondent


INTERIM ORDER

Pending is Attorney Carey's "Motion for Stay" in this matter. The Board has filed an opposition to that motion, and has suggested that Attorney Carey is already in violation of the February 2, 2016 order of the Grievance Commission that purported to place restrictions on Attorney Carey's practice.

Because my schedule will not permit a hearing before March 24, at the earliest, because it appears that current clients of Attorney Carey are in need of legal representation throughout the month of March, and because it is not clear that the Grievance Commission had authority to impose restrictions pursuant to former Maine Bar Rule 7.1(e)(3), an interim order is necessary to maintain the status quo.

THEREFORE, pending hearing on Attorney Carey's motion, he is not required to comply with the Grievance Commission's February 2, 2016 order.

SO ORDERED. Dated: March 7, 2016

/s/_________

Ellen A. Gorman

Associate Justice, Maine Supreme Judicial Court


Summaries of

Bd. of Overseers of the Bar v. Carey

STATE OF MAINE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT
Mar 7, 2016
Docket No BAR-16-8 (Me. Mar. 7, 2016)
Case details for

Bd. of Overseers of the Bar v. Carey

Case Details

Full title:BOARD OF OVERSEERS OF THE BAR, Petitioner v. SETH T. CAREY, ESQ., Maine…

Court:STATE OF MAINE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT

Date published: Mar 7, 2016

Citations

Docket No BAR-16-8 (Me. Mar. 7, 2016)

Citing Cases

Carey v. Me. Bd. of Overseers of the Bar

Second is the Interim Order issued by Justice Gorman which stayed the Grievance Commission's Report of…

Carey v. Maine Board of Overseers of Bar

Second is the Interim Order issued by Justice Gorman which stayed the Grievance Commission's Report of…