From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bartels v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 29, 2016
Case No. CV 15-05144 AFM (C.D. Cal. Jan. 29, 2016)

Summary

affirming the ALJ's decision denying social security benefits even though the ALJ erred in discrediting a treating psychologist's opinions based on a purported lack of cognitive testing results because the error was harmless since the ALJ presented an independent, specific and legitimate reason supported by substantial evidence for giving little weight to the opinions of that treating psychologist

Summary of this case from Benear v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec. Admin.

Opinion

Case No. CV 15-05144 AFM

01-29-2016

RONALD W. BARTELS, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


JUDGMENT

In accordance with the Order Affirming Decision of Commissioner filed concurrently herewith,

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Commissioner's decision is AFFIRMED. DATED: January 29, 2016

/s/_________

ALEXANDER F. MacKINNON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Bartels v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 29, 2016
Case No. CV 15-05144 AFM (C.D. Cal. Jan. 29, 2016)

affirming the ALJ's decision denying social security benefits even though the ALJ erred in discrediting a treating psychologist's opinions based on a purported lack of cognitive testing results because the error was harmless since the ALJ presented an independent, specific and legitimate reason supported by substantial evidence for giving little weight to the opinions of that treating psychologist

Summary of this case from Benear v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec. Admin.
Case details for

Bartels v. Colvin

Case Details

Full title:RONALD W. BARTELS, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 29, 2016

Citations

Case No. CV 15-05144 AFM (C.D. Cal. Jan. 29, 2016)

Citing Cases

Spears v. Berryhill

Though the ALJ may have erred in this regard, any error was harmless because he identified and explained a…

Schoor-Haddad v. Berryhill

Because the ALJ adequately identified and explained a specific and legitimate reason for rejecting Dr. Tran's…