From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barry v. Romanosky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 21, 1989
147 A.D.2d 605 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Summary

holding that the plaintiff's injuries were covered by the policy because defendant "did not intend or expect to cause the injury" and there was "nothing in the record to support a conclusion other than that the plaintiff's injuries were the accidental result of [defendant's] intentional act"

Summary of this case from Castlepoint Ins. Co. v. Tolchin

Opinion

February 21, 1989

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Mazzei, J.).


Ordered that the order is modified by deleting therefrom that portion which granted that branch of the plaintiff's motion which was for summary judgment directing the defendant Continental Insurance Company to pay the plaintiff's attorney's fees incurred in the prosecution of this action, and substituting therefor a provision denying that branch of the motion; as so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

On January 27, 1984 the defendant Jan C. Romanosky became involved in an altercation with several bouncers at the Emotions discotheque. He was ejected from the club and a short while later he took a 12-gauge shotgun and fired a round of buckshot at the front door of the club, injuring the plaintiff who was inside. Jan C. Romanosky was subsequently arrested and charged with assault in the first degree. He ultimately pleaded guilty to attempted assault in the first degree. At his plea allocution he told the court that he only intended to damage the door of the discotheque and that he did not think that anyone would be injured.

Thereafter, the plaintiff commenced a negligence action against Jan C. Romanosky and others. In January 1985, the Supreme Court awarded summary judgment to the plaintiff on the issue of liability. Subsequently the defendant Continental Insurance Company (hereinafter Continental) informed Jan C. Romanosky that it would not pay any judgment rendered against him since the insurance policy under which he was being sued excluded from its coverage "bodily injury * * * that is expected or intended by a covered person".

The plaintiff then commenced the instant action for a judgment declaring, inter alia, that Continental had a duty to indemnify Jan C. Romanosky for any judgment awarded the plaintiff in the negligence action. In or about October 1987 the plaintiff moved for summary judgment in this declaratory judgment action and, inter alia, asked the court to award him reasonable attorney's fees for the cost of prosecuting this action. The court reviewed the papers the plaintiff had submitted in support of his summary judgment motion in the negligence action, as well as additional affirmations in support of and in opposition to the instant motion, and concluded that there was nothing in the record to support a finding that Jan C. Romanosky either intended or expected to cause the plaintiff's injuries. Therefore, Continental would be required to indemnify Jan C. Romanosky for any money damages awarded the plaintiff in the underlying action. The court also awarded the plaintiff attorney's fees.

Supreme Court properly awarded summary judgment to the plaintiff on the indemnification issue. There is nothing in the record to support a conclusion other than that the plaintiff's injuries were the accidental result of Jan C. Romanosky's intentional act. Under those circumstances, Jan C. Romanosky did not intend or expect to cause the injury and therefore the injuries are covered by the policy (see, Miller v Continental Ins. Co., 40 N.Y.2d 675; McGroarty v Great Am. Ins. Co., 36 N.Y.2d 358, 364; Baldinger v Consolidated Mut. Ins. Co., 15 A.D.2d 526, affd 11 N.Y.2d 1026).

The plaintiff is not entitled to attorney's fees since such an award may only be made when an insurer takes legal steps to free itself from its policy obligations, thereby casting the insured in a defensive posture (see, Mighty Midgets v Centennial Ins. Co., 47 N.Y.2d 12; State Farm Fire Cas. Co. v Irene S., 138 A.D.2d 589). Where a party brings an action to determine its rights vis-a-vis an insurance policy, attorney's fees are not recoverable (see, Johnson v General Mut. Ins. Co., 24 N.Y.2d 42). Bracken, J.P., Lawrence, Kooper and Sullivan, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Barry v. Romanosky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 21, 1989
147 A.D.2d 605 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

holding that the plaintiff's injuries were covered by the policy because defendant "did not intend or expect to cause the injury" and there was "nothing in the record to support a conclusion other than that the plaintiff's injuries were the accidental result of [defendant's] intentional act"

Summary of this case from Castlepoint Ins. Co. v. Tolchin

construing liability policy of a discotheque

Summary of this case from Moncada v. Rubin-Spangle Gallery, Inc.
Case details for

Barry v. Romanosky

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM BARRY, Respondent, v. JAN C. ROMANOSKY et al., Respondents, and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 21, 1989

Citations

147 A.D.2d 605 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
538 N.Y.S.2d 14

Citing Cases

Moncada v. Rubin-Spangle Gallery, Inc.

Moreover, injuries that are the "accidental results" of intentional acts may, depending on the facts of the…

Acgic v. Marzonie

These cases were occurrence-based policies with the same exclusion as in the instant case. See Lyons v…