From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Banks v. State Farm

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Nov 18, 2013
Civil Action No. 2:13-cv-1152 (W.D. Pa. Nov. 18, 2013)

Summary

holding the later-filed case involved improper claim-splitting under Walton even though it added an additional individual defendant because the added defendant's alleged individual liability hinged on his role within the Bureau of Prisons and involved "the same operative facts and legal theories" applied to other defendants within the Bureau of Prisons

Summary of this case from Acosta v. Gaudin

Opinion

Civil Action No. 2:13-cv-1152

11-18-2013

FREDERICK BANKS, Plaintiff, v. STATE FARM, et al., Defendants.


Judge Nora Barry Fischer

Chief Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo

Lenihan


MEMORANDUM ORDER

Plaintiff commenced this civil action on July 26, 2013 by filing a Complaint (ECF No. 1) and Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2) in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania at Case No. 1:13-cv-02016. The Middle District transferred the case to this District on August 8, 2013, the case was referred to Chief United States Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrate Judges Act, 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1), and Local Rules of Court 72.C and 72.D. Judge Lenihan entered an order on October 17, 2013 granting the Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis.

On October 28, 2013, the Magistrate Judge filed her Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 7) in which she recommended that the Complaint be dismissed without prejudice as to Defendants State Farm, Nikole Sullivan, Dan Lnu, Congressman Doyle, Four Unknown Named BOP agents at FCC Forrest City, AK, Warden Anthony Haynes, Captain Wise, and Charles Samuels. The Magistrate Judge further recommended that the Complaint as to Judge Brian S. Miller be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and (iii). Service of the Report and Recommendation was made on Plaintiff at his address of record, P.O. Box 42303, Pittsburgh, PA 15203, as well as at #057-11068, North East Ohio Correctional Center, 2240 Hubbard Road, Youngstown, OH 44505. Plaintiff was informed that in accordance with the Magistrate Judges Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and (C), and Rule 72.D.2 of the Local Rules of Court, that he had fourteen (14) days to file any objections. No Objections have been filed to the Report and Recommendation.

After a review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, the following Order is entered:

AND NOW, this 18th day of November, 2013,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Complaint filed by Plaintiff Frederick Banks (ECF No. 1) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as to Defendants State Farm, Nikole Sullivan, Dan Lnu, Congressman Doyle, Four Unknown Named BOP agents at FCC Forrest City, AK, Warden Anthony Haynes, Captain Wise, and Charles Samuels.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Complaint filed by Plaintiff Frederick Banks (ECF No. 1) is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as to Defendant Judge Brian S. Miller pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and (iii).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 7) of Chief Magistrate Judge Lenihan, dated October 28, 2013, is adopted as the opinion of the Court.

The Clerk of Court is directed to mark this case closed.

BY THE COURT:

____________

NORA BARRY FISCHER

United States District Judge
cc: Frederick Banks

P.O. Box 42303

Pittsburgh, PA 15203

Via First Class Mail

Frederick Banks

USMS # 057-11068

North East Ohio Correctional Center

2240 Hubbard Road

Youngstown, OH 44505

Via U.S. First Class Mail


Summaries of

Banks v. State Farm

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Nov 18, 2013
Civil Action No. 2:13-cv-1152 (W.D. Pa. Nov. 18, 2013)

holding the later-filed case involved improper claim-splitting under Walton even though it added an additional individual defendant because the added defendant's alleged individual liability hinged on his role within the Bureau of Prisons and involved "the same operative facts and legal theories" applied to other defendants within the Bureau of Prisons

Summary of this case from Acosta v. Gaudin
Case details for

Banks v. State Farm

Case Details

Full title:FREDERICK BANKS, Plaintiff, v. STATE FARM, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Nov 18, 2013

Citations

Civil Action No. 2:13-cv-1152 (W.D. Pa. Nov. 18, 2013)

Citing Cases

Rice v. Nathan Rice, Inc.

The addition of Reidbord and Perelman as Defendants in this case, where the only facts specifically alleged…

Pinson v. United States

Accordingly, the claims against the United States are substantially identical for purposes of applying…