holding that several defendants were not liable for monetary damages under § 1983 because they were named in their official capacities only, in contrast with other defendants who were specifically sued in their individual and official capacities; citing Wells
Summary of this case from Moore v. City of HarrimanNo. 91-5340.
March 3, 1992.
Appeal from the M.D.Tenn.
AFFIRMED.
holding that several defendants were not liable for monetary damages under § 1983 because they were named in their official capacities only, in contrast with other defendants who were specifically sued in their individual and official capacities; citing Wells
Summary of this case from Moore v. City of Harrimanholding that mere "supervision of the production and [provision of] ideas for the videotapes" was not enough to find defendant a joint author
Summary of this case from Sullivan v. Flora, Inc.affirming dismissal of a copyright infringement case because the plaintiff failed to prove that she owned the copyrights at the time she filed the lawsuit
Summary of this case from Liang v. AWG Remarketing, Inc.Full title:BANCTRAINING VIDEO SYSTEMS v. FIRST AMERICAN CORP
Court:United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Date published: Mar 3, 1992
Thomson v. Larson, 147 F.3d 195, 199 (2d Cir. 1998) (citing § 201(a)); Childress, 945 F.2d at 508. In an…
Tangwall v. Wacker"The record establishesthat defendantTangwall's statement inhis objection documentthat he was 'not noticedof…