Summary
finding that RFC limiting an individual to work in "a non-production oriented environment" properly addressed an individual's ability to stay on task
Summary of this case from Dawson v. SaulOpinion
CIVIL NO. 3:15cv637-HEH
06-28-2016
FINAL ORDER
(Adopting Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge)
This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (R&R) entered on June 7, 2016 (ECF No. 23). The time to file objections has expired and neither party has objected to the R&R. Having considered the matter and deeming it otherwise proper and just to do so, it is hereby ORDERED:
(1) The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 23) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED as the OPINION of the Court.
(2) Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 12) is DENIED.
(3) Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 14) is GRANTED.
(4) The decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED.
Let the Clerk of the Court send a copy of this Final Order to Plaintiff and all counsel of record.
It is so ORDERED. Richmond, Virginia Date: June 28, 2016
/s/_________
Henry E. Hudson
United States District Judge