holding that retaliatory searches of inmate's cell ten times in nineteen days and leaving cell in disarray after three of those searches could amount to cruel and unusual punishment
Summary of this case from Harris v. FaunceNo. 91-7002.
March 23, 1992, OCTOBER TERM, 1991.
C.A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 940 F. 2d 1150.
holding that retaliatory searches of inmate's cell ten times in nineteen days and leaving cell in disarray after three of those searches could amount to cruel and unusual punishment
Summary of this case from Harris v. Fauncefinding harassment where prisoner's cell was searched ten times in nineteen days, i.e., more frequently than on bi-daily basis
Summary of this case from Terrell v. Hendricksfinding harassment where prisoner's cell was searched ten times in nineteen days
Summary of this case from Toolasprashad v. Wrightconcluding that a sexually violent predator had no due process right to "psychiatric treatment to overcome a 'sexual offender condition'"
Summary of this case from Roberts v. VelezFull title:BAILEY v. NOOT ET AL
Court:U.S.
Date published: Mar 23, 1992
Subsidiary findings of historical fact and findings that certain decisions by counsel were tactical choices,…
Wilfong v. Morris County Correctional FacilityNumerous searches conducted within a short period of time may suggest intent to harass an inmate. See Scher…