stating that the "defendant tortfeasor cannot be a party to the contractual or economic relations with which he has allegedly interfered."
Summary of this case from Nation. Bd. Certif. Occup. v. Amer. Occup. TherapyNo. 92-513.
November 9, 1992.
C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 957 F. 2d 268.
stating that the "defendant tortfeasor cannot be a party to the contractual or economic relations with which he has allegedly interfered."
Summary of this case from Nation. Bd. Certif. Occup. v. Amer. Occup. Therapyapplying NYSHRL
Summary of this case from Rocco v. Goldberg (In re Goldberg)applying that assumption
Summary of this case from Portland State Univ. Chapter of the Am. Ass'n of Univ. Professors v. Portland State Univ.Full title:BAGGS v. EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC
Court:U.S.
Date published: Nov 9, 1992
Fed.R.Civ.P. 9(h); Baris, 932 F.2d at 1547; Trentacosta v. Frontier Pacific Aircraft Indus., Inc., 813 F.2d…
Kaser v. Financial Protection MarketingMaryland has long recognized the tort of interference with contractual or business relationships. See, e.g.,…