Opinion
(3832)
Argued November 5, 1986 —
Decision released December 16, 1986
Action to recover damages for the breach of a contract for the purchase of certain equipment, brought to the Superior Court in the judicial district of Litchfield and tried to the court, Pickett, J.; judgment for the plaintiff, from which the defendant appealed to this court. No error.
Edmund W. Price, pro se, the appellant (defendant).
Pat Labbadia III, with whom, on the brief, was Robert S. Touger, for the appellee (plaintiff).
The trial court did not file a memorandum of decision in this case. The judgment states that the court found the issues for the plaintiff on the second count and on the counterclaim. The court, by this language, resolved all disputed issues in favor of the plaintiff. The defendant did not file a motion for articulation; Practice Book 3082 (now 4051); Thiel Realty Corporation v. Culligan Water Conditioning Co., 9 Conn. App. 191, 192, 517 A.2d 1052 (1986); nor did he seek an order to complete the record under Practice Book 3096 (now 4183); Montanaro Bros. Builders, Inc. v. Snow, 4 Conn. App. 46, 50-51, 492 A.2d 223 (1985). It is the appellant's responsibility to provide an adequate record for review. Practice Book 3060D (now 4061); Barnes v. Barnes, 190 Conn. 491, 494, 460 A.2d 1302 (1983). From the limited record before us, we cannot find that the conclusions of the trial court were clearly erroneous. Practice Book 3060D; Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Manchester, 181 Conn. 217, 221-22, 435 A.2d 24 (1980).
Because the briefs in this case Were filed prior to October 1, 1986, we are governed by the rules in effect prior to that date.