Summary
dismissing an appeal of an order denying a motion for summary judgment because it is a non-appealable, nonfinal order
Summary of this case from Basner v. BergdollOpinion
No. 1D11–5919.
2012-03-14
Scott F. ATEN, Appellant, v. DELL AIR HEATING, Air Conditioning & Refrigeration, Inc./Amerisure Insurance Co., Appellees.
An appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims, Thomas W. Sculco, Judge. Joey D. Oquist of Royal Palm Legal Services, P.A., St. Petersburg, for Appellant. Jamey Rodgers, Maitland, for Appellees.
An appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims, Thomas W. Sculco, Judge. Joey D. Oquist of Royal Palm Legal Services, P.A., St. Petersburg, for Appellant. Jamey Rodgers, Maitland, for Appellees.
PER CURIAM.
Upon review of Appellant's response to this court's December 2, 2011, order to show cause, we conclude the order on appeal is a non-appealable, nonfinal order because it merely denies Appellant's motion for summary final order, without disposing of the claim. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.180(b)(1); Green Tree Servicing, LLC v. Genaux, 951 So.2d 1000 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007) (dismissing appeal as premature because order merely denies motion for summary judgment and is not an appealable final order). Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.