From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Armendarez v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc
Oct 31, 1990
798 S.W.2d 291 (Tex. Crim. App. 1990)

Summary

holding that an issue regarding pretrial bail was moot because the appellant was legally confined pursuant to a conviction in the underlying case

Summary of this case from Ex parte Madurai

Opinion

No. 71115.

October 31, 1990.

Appeal from Criminal District Court No. 4, Tarrant County, Wendell A. Odom, J.

Mary B. Thornton, Fort Worth, for appellant.

Tim Curry, Dist. Atty., and C. Chris Marshall, Lisa C. McMinn and Brent Carr, Asst. Dist. Attys., Fort Worth, Robert Huttash, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.

Before the court en banc.


OPINION


This is a direct appeal from the denial of bail pursuant to the provisions of Article I, Section 11a of the Texas Constitution, which provides in part that an accused may be held without bond if he is accused of committing a felony less than capital while on bail for a prior felony. Appellant was accused by felony complaint No. 0414849 of the offense of illegal investment on August 10, 1990. A hearing was held at which the State presented evidence that appellant had committed the charged offense while out on bail for the offense of delivery of a controlled substance, Cause No. 0399769A. The trial court ordered appellant held without bail.

In light of appellant's conviction in Cause No. 0414849A on October 4, 1990, and the subsequent assessment of punishment at life imprisonment, we find the issue on appeal to be moot.

Accordingly, we dismiss appellant's appeal from the denial of bail.

STURNS, J., not participating.


Summaries of

Armendarez v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc
Oct 31, 1990
798 S.W.2d 291 (Tex. Crim. App. 1990)

holding that an issue regarding pretrial bail was moot because the appellant was legally confined pursuant to a conviction in the underlying case

Summary of this case from Ex parte Madurai
Case details for

Armendarez v. State

Case Details

Full title:Crest ARMENDAREZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc

Date published: Oct 31, 1990

Citations

798 S.W.2d 291 (Tex. Crim. App. 1990)

Citing Cases

Zaratti v. State

In Criner v. State, we stated: If the aforementioned sixty day period expires during the pendency of the…

Walker v. State

See Ex parte Tucker, 3 S.W.3d 576, 576 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999) ("The appellant having been tried during the…