From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ariana M. v. Humana Health Plan of Tex., Inc.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Jul 10, 2017
869 F.3d 354 (5th Cir. 2017)

Summary

considering the proper standard of review in ERISA cases

Summary of this case from Ramirez v. United of Omaha Life Ins. Co.

Opinion

No. 16-20174

07-10-2017

ARIANA M., Plaintiff–Appellant v. HUMANA HEALTH PLAN OF TEXAS, INCORPORATED, Defendant–Appellee

Peter S. Sessions, Esq., Kantor & Kantor, L.L.P., Northridge, CA, Amar B. Raval, Plummer Law Group, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff–Appellant. Carlos Ramon Soltero, Rachael Kelly Padgett, McGinnis, Lochridge & Kilgore, L.L.P., Austin, TX, for Defendant–Appellee. Mary Ellen E. Signorille, Senior Attorney, AARP Foundation Litigation, Washington, DC, for Amicus Curiae American Association of Retired Persons. Cynthia Morales, Office of the Attorney General, Financial Litigation & Charitable Trusts Division, Austin, TX, for Amicus Curiae Texas Department of Insurance. Alicia M. Paulino-Grisham, Paulino-Grisham, Smith & Chmielarz, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, FL, for Amicus Curiae Alliance for Eating Disorders Awareness. Joseph Ross Matetich, Office of Public Insurance Counsel for the State of Texas, Austin, TX, for Amicus Curiae Texas Office of Public Insurance Counsel.


Peter S. Sessions, Esq., Kantor & Kantor, L.L.P., Northridge, CA, Amar B. Raval, Plummer Law Group, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff–Appellant.

Carlos Ramon Soltero, Rachael Kelly Padgett, McGinnis, Lochridge & Kilgore, L.L.P., Austin, TX, for Defendant–Appellee.

Mary Ellen E. Signorille, Senior Attorney, AARP Foundation Litigation, Washington, DC, for Amicus Curiae American Association of Retired Persons.

Cynthia Morales, Office of the Attorney General, Financial Litigation & Charitable Trusts Division, Austin, TX, for Amicus Curiae Texas Department of Insurance.

Alicia M. Paulino-Grisham, Paulino-Grisham, Smith & Chmielarz, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, FL, for Amicus Curiae Alliance for Eating Disorders Awareness.

Joseph Ross Matetich, Office of Public Insurance Counsel for the State of Texas, Austin, TX, for Amicus Curiae Texas Office of Public Insurance Counsel.

Before STEWART, Chief Judge, JOLLY, JONES, SMITH, DENNIS, CLEMENT, PRADO, OWEN, ELROD, SOUTHWICK, HAYNES, GRAVES, HIGGINSON and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of the court having requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc, and a majority of the circuit judges in regular active service and not disqualified having voted in favor,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.


Summaries of

Ariana M. v. Humana Health Plan of Tex., Inc.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Jul 10, 2017
869 F.3d 354 (5th Cir. 2017)

considering the proper standard of review in ERISA cases

Summary of this case from Ramirez v. United of Omaha Life Ins. Co.
Case details for

Ariana M. v. Humana Health Plan of Tex., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:ARIANA M., Plaintiff - Appellant v. HUMANA HEALTH PLAN OF TEXAS…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Jul 10, 2017

Citations

869 F.3d 354 (5th Cir. 2017)

Citing Cases

Jackson v. Aetna Life Ins. Co.

It argues that other language in the policy confers Aetna with discretion that is sufficient to create…

Ramirez v. United of Omaha Life Ins. Co.

However, even applying a de novo standard, the district court correctly construed the policy as applied to…