From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Archer Motor Company v. State of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 2, 1964
198 N.E.2d 907 (N.Y. 1964)

Summary

In Archer Motor Co. v. State of New York (14 N.Y.2d 678, 679) the Court of Appeals stated: "The receipt of the purchase offer in evidence was error but the record indicates that the award was supported by other competent and substantial evidence sufficient to justify the award."

Summary of this case from Tallmadge v. State

Opinion

Argued March 24, 1964

Decided April 2, 1964

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department, RICHARD S. HELLER, J.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General ( Douglas Manley and Paxton Blair of counsel), for appellant.

Henry Dutcher, Jr., for respondent.


Judgment affirmed, with costs. The receipt of the purchase offer in evidence was error but the record indicates that the award was supported by other competent and substantial evidence sufficient to justify the award.

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges DYE, FULD, VAN VOORHIS, BURKE, SCILEPPI and BERGAN.


Summaries of

Archer Motor Company v. State of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 2, 1964
198 N.E.2d 907 (N.Y. 1964)

In Archer Motor Co. v. State of New York (14 N.Y.2d 678, 679) the Court of Appeals stated: "The receipt of the purchase offer in evidence was error but the record indicates that the award was supported by other competent and substantial evidence sufficient to justify the award."

Summary of this case from Tallmadge v. State
Case details for

Archer Motor Company v. State of New York

Case Details

Full title:ARCHER MOTOR COMPANY, INC., Respondent, v. STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Apr 2, 1964

Citations

198 N.E.2d 907 (N.Y. 1964)
198 N.E.2d 907
249 N.Y.S.2d 877

Citing Cases

Tallmadge v. State

Appeal by the State from a judgment of the Court of Claims awarding claimant $45,000 plus interest, for the…