Summary
In Andrus, the Superior Court held that the evidence was insufficient to establish that a sentence reduction agreement (either implicit or explicit) existed between Richmond and the State, notwithstanding Richmond's contrary testimony.
Summary of this case from Fogg v. StateOpinion
No. 512, 2010.
January 13, 2011.
Court Below — Superior Court of the State of Delaware, in and for New Castle County, Cr.I.D. 9504004126.
Before HOLLAND, BERGER and JACOBS, Justices.
ORDER
This 13th day of January 2011, the Court having considered this matter after oral argument and on the briefs filed by the parties has determined that the final judgment of the Superior Court should be affirmed on the basis of and for the reasons assigned by the Superior Court in its well-reasoned decision dated July 22, 2010.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the judgment of the Superior Court be, and the same hereby is, AFFIRMED.