From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Amerson v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Aug 31, 2015
Case No. 12-14395 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 31, 2015)

Summary

addressing the attorney's effectiveness and propriety by merely noting that "[i]n this case, there is no suggestion that Ms. Guerra behaved improperly or was ineffective"

Summary of this case from Jones v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Opinion

Case No. 12-14395

08-31-2015

PATRICE AMERSON, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.


David R. Grand United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER (1) ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (ECF NO. 31); (2) GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S ATTORNEY'S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) (ECF NO. 28); AND (3) AWARDING ATTORNEY FEES IN THE AMOUNT OF $6,124.25

Before the Court is Magistrate Judge David R. Grand's August 7, 2015 Report and Recommendation regarding Plaintiff's attorney's motion for Attorneys' Fees under pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). (Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 31). As set forth in the Report and Recommendation, the Magistrate Judge recommends that this Court grant Plaintiff's attorney's motion and award her attorney fees in the amount of $6,124.25.

Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation, and there being no timely objections from either party under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and E.D. Mich L.R. 72.1(d), the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 31); GRANTS Plaintiff's Attorney's Motion for Attorney Fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) (ECF No. 28); and award fees to her in the amount of $6,124.25.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Paul D. Borman

PAUL D. BORMAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated: August 31, 2015

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first class U.S. mail on August 31, 2015.

s/Deborah Tofil

Case Manager


Summaries of

Amerson v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Aug 31, 2015
Case No. 12-14395 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 31, 2015)

addressing the attorney's effectiveness and propriety by merely noting that "[i]n this case, there is no suggestion that Ms. Guerra behaved improperly or was ineffective"

Summary of this case from Jones v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

addressing the attorney's effectiveness and propriety by merely noting that "[i]n this case, there is no suggestion that Ms. Guerra behaved improperly or was ineffective"

Summary of this case from Riddle v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.
Case details for

Amerson v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Case Details

Full title:PATRICE AMERSON, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Aug 31, 2015

Citations

Case No. 12-14395 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 31, 2015)

Citing Cases

Riddle v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

No party has suggested that Plaintiff's counsel acted improperly or ineffectively, and the Court has no…

Jones v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

No party has suggested that Plaintiff's counsel acted improperly or ineffectively, and the Court has no…