Summary
concluding admission of gang affiliation evidence at trial did not violate First Amendment rights where jury could draw permissible inferences from that evidence
Summary of this case from Gonzalas v. BeanOpinion
Argued March 11, 1993. Submission Deferred April 12, 1993
Editorial Note:
This opinion appears in the Federal reporter in a table titled "Table of Decisions Without Reported Opinions". (See FI CTA9 Rule 36-3 regarding use of unpublished opinions)
Submitted Aug. 9, 1994.
Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Arizona, No. CV 89-1004-PHX-PGR; Paul G. Rosenblatt, District Judge, Presiding.
D.Ariz.
AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED.
Before: GOODWIN, NOONAN, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges
ORDER
This case is hereby submitted as of August 9, 1994.
The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED as to dismissal of the fraudulent conveyance claims but REVERSED as to the alter ego claim (the Third Claim for Relief in the appellants' Second Consolidated Amended Complaint). The latter claim is REMANDED to the district court to be resolved on the merits.