From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Allergan U.S., Inc. v. Imprimis Pharm., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SOUTHERN DIVISION
May 28, 2019
Case No. 8:17-cv-01551-DOC-JDE (C.D. Cal. May. 28, 2019)

Summary

In Allergan v. Imprimis, the court concluded, at the summary judgment stage, that '[u]nder the plain language of the statute, anticipatory mass compounding of standardized drugs in a 503A facility without identified individual patients based on valid prescription orders is clearly violative of the FDCA.

Summary of this case from Hope Med. Enters. v. Fagron Compounding Servs.

Opinion

Case No. 8:17-cv-01551-DOC-JDE

05-28-2019

ALLERGAN USA, INC., Plaintiff, v. IMPRIMIS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., Defendant.


JUDGMENT

Pursuant to the jury's verdict, Dkt. No. 228, judgment is hereby entered in favor of plaintiff Allergan USA, Inc. and against defendant Imprimis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. in the amount of $48,500. Dated: May 28, 2019

/s/_________

Honorable David O. Carter

Judge United States District Court


Summaries of

Allergan U.S., Inc. v. Imprimis Pharm., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SOUTHERN DIVISION
May 28, 2019
Case No. 8:17-cv-01551-DOC-JDE (C.D. Cal. May. 28, 2019)

In Allergan v. Imprimis, the court concluded, at the summary judgment stage, that '[u]nder the plain language of the statute, anticipatory mass compounding of standardized drugs in a 503A facility without identified individual patients based on valid prescription orders is clearly violative of the FDCA.

Summary of this case from Hope Med. Enters. v. Fagron Compounding Servs.
Case details for

Allergan U.S., Inc. v. Imprimis Pharm., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:ALLERGAN USA, INC., Plaintiff, v. IMPRIMIS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: May 28, 2019

Citations

Case No. 8:17-cv-01551-DOC-JDE (C.D. Cal. May. 28, 2019)

Citing Cases

Hope Med. Enters. v. Fagron Compounding Servs.

See 21 U.S.C. § 353a. "Drug products compounded 'for an identified individual patient that are necessary for…

Mai v. Supercell Oy

Second, the purchase of illegal or unapproved drugs or other products may constitute a cognizable economic…