holding that denial of benefits was arbitrary and capricious where the terms of the plan precluded coverage for employees "dismissed for cause as defined in the Delta Employee Manual," thereby requiring the Plan Administrator to make a determination as to whether the plaintiff's actions "were insubordinate and interfered with the work of others"

holding public policy found in a state regulation cannot support a wrongful discharge claim because policy was not defined by constitutional or statutory provision

affirming the denial of objections because "[t]he district court properly found that Allen did not address the magistrate judge's conclusions in his objections"

affirming summary judgment on a THRA claim for aiding and abetting because "[t]he record is devoid of any proof that [the defendant] aided, abetted, incited, compelled, or commanded another person to engage a in discriminatory act against" the plaintiff

affirming district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of individual defendant on THRA claim when defendant's actions adverse to plaintiff's employment were all within the legitimate scope of defendant's delegated management authority

rejecting discrimination claim where, among other things, plaintiff was “a trained physician with specialized skill in anesthesia and he exercised independent judgment in patient care.”

rejecting discrimination claim where, among other things, plaintiff was "a trained physician with specialized skill in anesthesia and he exercised independent judgment in patient care."