From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

A.J. MORRIS v. DE LAGE

Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth
Jul 15, 2010
No. 02-09-00422-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 15, 2010)

Opinion

No. 02-09-00422-CV

Delivered: July 15, 2010.

Appealed from the 67th District Court of Tarrant County.

PANEL: DAUPHINOT, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT


On June 14, 2010, we notified appellants A.J. Morris, M.D., P.A. and Rio Grande Valley Imaging, Inc. that their brief had not been filed as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(a). See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated that we could dismiss their appeal for want of prosecution unless those appellants or any party desiring to continue the appeal filed with the court within ten days a response showing grounds for continuing their appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3. We have not received any response.

Because their appellants' brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal of A.J. Morris, M.D., P.A. and Rio Grande Valley Imaging, Inc. for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), 43.2(f). The appeal of A.J. Morris, M.D. is still pending. This case shall hereafter be styled "A.J. Morris, M.D. v. De Lage Landen Financial Services, Inc."

Appellants A.J. Morris, M.D., P.A. and Rio Grande Valley Imaging, Inc. shall pay all costs of their appeal, for which let execution issue.


Summaries of

A.J. MORRIS v. DE LAGE

Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth
Jul 15, 2010
No. 02-09-00422-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 15, 2010)
Case details for

A.J. MORRIS v. DE LAGE

Case Details

Full title:A.J. MORRIS, M.D., A.J. MORRIS, M.D., P.A., AND RIO GRANDE VALLEY IMAGING…

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth

Date published: Jul 15, 2010

Citations

No. 02-09-00422-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 15, 2010)