From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Advance Int'l, Inc. v. N.C. Nat'l Bank of S.C

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Jan 22, 1996
320 S.C. 532 (S.C. 1996)

Summary

finding claims of fraud, negligence, and unfair trade practices in a foreclosure action were not compulsory because those claims did not affect the enforceability of the note

Summary of this case from Carolina First Bank v. Badd, L.L.C.

Opinion

24371

Heard November 14, 1995

Decided January 22, 1996

Appeal From Richland County Walter J. Bristow, Jr., Special Circuit Judge.

S. Keith Hutto, and James Y. Becker, both of Nelson Mullins Riley Scarborough, L.L.P., of Columbia, for petitioner. Harry A. Swagart, III, of Swagart Walker, P.A., Columbia, for respondent.


ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS


We granted certiorari to review the Court of Appeals' decision in Advance Internat'l, Inc. v. North Carolina Nat'l Bank, ___ S.C. ___ 449 S.E.2d 580 (Ct.App. 1994). We affirm that decision to the extent it upholds the circuit court order striking the res judicata and compulsory counterclaim defenses from petitioner's answer. We vacate the opinion, however, to the extent it decides in dicta issues related to the doctrines of unclean hands and equitable subordination.

Affirmed in part; vacated in part.


Summaries of

Advance Int'l, Inc. v. N.C. Nat'l Bank of S.C

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Jan 22, 1996
320 S.C. 532 (S.C. 1996)

finding claims of fraud, negligence, and unfair trade practices in a foreclosure action were not compulsory because those claims did not affect the enforceability of the note

Summary of this case from Carolina First Bank v. Badd, L.L.C.

finding claims of fraud, negligence, and unfair trade practices in a foreclosure action were not compulsory because those claims did not affect the enforceability of the note

Summary of this case from Carolina First Bank v. Badd, L.L.C.
Case details for

Advance Int'l, Inc. v. N.C. Nat'l Bank of S.C

Case Details

Full title:ADVANCE INTERNATIONAL, INC., Respondent v. NORTH CAROLINA NATIONAL BANK OF…

Court:Supreme Court of South Carolina

Date published: Jan 22, 1996

Citations

320 S.C. 532 (S.C. 1996)
466 S.E.2d 367

Citing Cases

Wells Fargo Bank, NA, v. Smith

In essence, the “logical relationship” determination is made by asking whether the counterclaim would affect…

Wells Fargo Bank, NA v. Smith

In essence, the "logical relationship" determination is made by asking whether the counterclaim would affect…