From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Adamar of N.J. v. Dir. Div. of Tax

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
Feb 5, 1999
18 N.J. Tax 70 (Tax 1999)

Opinion

Argued January 25, 1999.

Decided February 5, 1999.

On Appeal from the Tax Court of New Jersey, whose opinion is reported at 17 N.J.Tax 80 (1997).

Before Judges HAVEY, SKILLMAN and LESEMANN.

Janyce M. Wilson, for appellants ( Graham, Curtin Sheridan, attorneys; Ms. Wilson and Kent L. Schwarz, on the brief).

Marlene G. Brown, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent ( Peter Verniero, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney; Joseph L. Yannotti, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel; Ms. Brown, on the brief).


We affirm substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Kuskin in the opinion of the Tax Court reported at 17 N.J.Tax 80 (1997).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Adamar of N.J. v. Dir. Div. of Tax

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
Feb 5, 1999
18 N.J. Tax 70 (Tax 1999)
Case details for

Adamar of N.J. v. Dir. Div. of Tax

Case Details

Full title:ADAMAR OF NEW JERSEY, T/A TROPWORLD CASINO ENTERTAINMENT RESORT, BALLY'S…

Court:Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division

Date published: Feb 5, 1999

Citations

18 N.J. Tax 70 (Tax 1999)

Citing Cases

Sodexho v. Director, Div. of Taxation

The parties have stipulated that SFMC and SEH are both organizations that qualify for exemption under…

Xpedite Sys., Inc. v. Dir., Div. of Taxation

1984) (in interpreting statutes, courts must "follow the clear import of statutory language," and "when…