arguing that the existence of some legal applications saves statute
Summary of this case from Planned Parenthood Se., Inc. v. StrangeNo. 92-104.
November 30, 1992, October TERM, 1991.
C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 962 F. 2d 1366.
arguing that the existence of some legal applications saves statute
Summary of this case from Planned Parenthood Se., Inc. v. Strangenoting that there is no constitutional right to hybrid representation and that such a determination is left to the discretion of the court
Summary of this case from U.S. v. Stewartexplaining the Roe court “seemingly employed an ‘overbreadth’ approach”
Summary of this case from State v. Edouardexplaining the Roe court “seemingly employed an ‘overbreadth’ approach”
Summary of this case from State v. EdouardFull title:ADA, GOVERNOR OF GUAM v. GUAM SOCIETY OF OBSTETRICIANS GYNECOLOGISTS ET AL
Court:U.S.
Date published: Nov 30, 1992
In an as-applied challenge, "the plaintiff contends that application of the statute in the particular context…
U.S. v. SandstromThus, preference for joint trial of jointly indicted defendants is not limited by any requirement that the…