Opinion
April 11, 1994
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lerner, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The finding of the Supreme Court that the plaintiff broker was the procuring cause of the lease obtained by the defendant is supported by the evidence adduced at the trial and will not be disturbed on appeal (see, Kapoor v Jaggi, 191 A.D.2d 479; Kriesler Borg Florman Gen. Constr. Co. v Rosen Morelli Masons, 181 A.D.2d 813; see also, Greene v Hellman, 51 N.Y.2d 197; Rennert Diana Co. v Ziskind, 191 A.D.2d 545; Holiday Mgt. Assocs. v Albanese, 173 A.D.2d 775, 776).
We have reviewed the parties' remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Thompson, J.P., Rosenblatt, Ritter and Santucci, JJ., concur.