From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kapoor v. Jaggi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 8, 1993
191 A.D.2d 479 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

March 8, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Modugno, J.H.O.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

It is well settled that "`[a] decision rendered by a court after a nonjury trial should not be disturbed on appeal unless it is clear that its conclusions could not have been reached under any fair interpretation of the evidence'" (Kreisler Borg Florman Gen. Constr. Co. v. Rosen Morelli Masons, 181 A.D.2d 813, 814, quoting Alleva v. Alleva Dairy, 129 A.D.2d 663). It cannot be said that the verdict herein could not have been reached on any fair interpretation of the evidence. Therefore, the trial court's determination should not be disturbed. Thompson, J.P., Sullivan, Miller and Santucci, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Kapoor v. Jaggi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 8, 1993
191 A.D.2d 479 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

Kapoor v. Jaggi

Case Details

Full title:SWARAN KAPOOR et al., Appellants, v. VIJAY JAGGI et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 8, 1993

Citations

191 A.D.2d 479 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
596 N.Y.S.2d 707

Citing Cases

Lewis v. Regency House, Inc.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs. The determination of the Judicial Hearing Officer is…

KBF Pollution Management, Inc. v. Interstate Litho Corp.

On appeal, the defendant contends that the court erred by finding in favor of the plaintiff because the…