From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Actelion Pharms., Ltd. v. Lee

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
May 9, 2014
565 F. App'x 887 (Fed. Cir. 2014)

Summary

affirming the district court's decision without an opinion under Federal Circuit Rule 36

Summary of this case from Nippon Shinyaku Co. v. Iancu

Opinion

2014-1086

05-09-2014

ACTELION PHARMACEUTICALS, LTD., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MICHELLE K. LEE, Deputy Director, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property, Defendant-Appellee.

THOMAS HOXIE, Hoxie & Associates, LLC, of Millburn, New Jersey, argued for plaintiff-appellant. ABBY C. WRIGHT, Attorney, Appellate Staff, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee. With her on the brief were STUART F. DELERY, Assistant Attorney General, RONALD C. MACHEN, JR., SCOTT MCINTOSH, and DANA KAERSVANG, Attorneys. Of counsel on the brief were NATHAN K. KELLEY, Deputy General Counsel for Intellectual Property Law and Solicitor, MICHAEL S. FORMAN and BRIAN T. RACILLA, Associate Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia in No. 1:10-cv-01145-RJL, Judge Richard J. Leon.

JUDGMENT

THOMAS HOXIE, Hoxie & Associates, LLC, of Millburn, New Jersey, argued for plaintiff-appellant.

ABBY C. WRIGHT, Attorney, Appellate Staff, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee. With her on the brief were STUART F. DELERY, Assistant Attorney General, RONALD C. MACHEN, JR., SCOTT MCINTOSH, and DANA KAERSVANG, Attorneys. Of counsel on the brief were NATHAN K. KELLEY, Deputy General Counsel for Intellectual Property Law and Solicitor, MICHAEL S. FORMAN and BRIAN T. RACILLA, Associate Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (DYK, REYNA, and TARANTO, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

__________

Daniel E. O'Toole

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

Actelion Pharms., Ltd. v. Lee

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
May 9, 2014
565 F. App'x 887 (Fed. Cir. 2014)

affirming the district court's decision without an opinion under Federal Circuit Rule 36

Summary of this case from Nippon Shinyaku Co. v. Iancu
Case details for

Actelion Pharms., Ltd. v. Lee

Case Details

Full title:ACTELION PHARMACEUTICALS, LTD., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MICHELLE K. LEE…

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: May 9, 2014

Citations

565 F. App'x 887 (Fed. Cir. 2014)

Citing Cases

Nippon Shinyaku Co. v. Iancu

SeeDaiichi II , 791 F.3d at 1379-80 (holding that the USPTO did not abuse its discretion by only applying the…

Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. Lee

Nevertheless, one court in this district has determined that 35 U.S.C. § 154(b)(4)(A) “speaks in…