Opinion
No. 67540
01-14-2016
ORDER GRANTING PETITION
This petition for a writ of mandamus challenges a district court order determining that NRS 41A.035 is unconstitutional. We recently considered a similar district court order in Tam v. Eighth Judicial District Court, 131 Nev., Adv. Op. 80, 358 P.3d 234 (2015), and held that NRS 41A.035 is constitutional, applies to medical malpractice actions, and applies per incident regardless of how many plaintiffs, defendants, or claims are involved. Based on Tam, we grant the petition and direct the clerk of this court to issue a writ of mandamus instructing the district court to vacate the portion of its March 2, 2015, order, entered in Case No. A-12-655566-C, that declared NRS 41A.035 unconstitutional.
It is so ORDERED.
/s/_________, J.
Hardesty
/s/_________, J.
Saitta
/s/_________, J.
Pickering cc: Hon. Jerry A. Wiese, District Judge
Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, LLP/Las Vegas
De Castroverde Law Group
Parker & Edwards
Hand & Sullivan, LLC
Snow, Christensen & Martineau
Daehnke Stevens, LLP
Bonne Bridges, Mueller, O'Keefe & Nichols
Eighth District Court Clerk